Search for: "Swan v." Results 41 - 60 of 376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” (PI0606487-6) “[I]ndependent claim 1 proposed in this opinion was based on example I-1, of the said table, where a composition was described containing elements C, Mn, Si, Al, S, P, Mo, Cr, W and V, being added to this composition the range of element N. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:03 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the Board’s decision that the challenged claims of the patent were unpatentable was affirmed (Ethicon LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
Our last blog entry, UPC: four reasons on why the PPA is not legally in force, published on 21 April 2022, seems to have touched a nerve, as attested by the unprecedented number of comments received, for which this author is very grateful. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Jonathan Swan and Zachary Basu report for Axios. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:12 pm by Staff
Morgan was the missing master of the F/V White Swan III. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by Nigel Stacey
The call came from Mike Morgan, master of the 32-foot F/V WHITE SWAN III. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm by fjhinojosa
Kastenberg, The Limits of Executive Power in Crisis in the Early Republic: Martin v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
And partus sequitur ventrem, often wrongly regarded as positing that the offspring of an animal belong to the owner of the mother (male seahorses carry their offspring through gestation), does not apply to cygnets (The Case of Swans (1572) 7 Co Rep 15b, 77 ER 435), which offspring are shared by owner of cock and hen supposedly because swans mate for life. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
On 5 October 2021, Nicklin J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the case of Vine v Belfield. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were 10 new… [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 04322-21 Ruayrungruang v The Sunday Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 04302-21 Lovatt v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03315-21 Ruayrungruang v The Daily Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 00798-21 Reynolds v The Daily Telegraph, 1… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Swan v Associated Newspapers, heard 15 July 2021 (Nicklin J) Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 6:39 pm by Uthman Law Office
Based on: San Francisco Chronicle, “A woman is suing S.F. for $50 million over a parking ticket, saying tire chalk is unconstitutional,” Rachel Swan, Sep. 11, 2021 https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/A-woman-is-suing-S-F-for-50-million-over-a-16450146.php ALISON PATRICIA TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:41 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Swan v Associated Newspapers, heard 15 July 2021 (Nicklin J) Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Next Week  in the Courts On 26 July 2021, Nicklin J will hear applications in the cases of BHX v GRX and BHX v Victim Support. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Swan’s paper falls within and introduces the Contracts part of the book. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Swan v Associated Newspapers. [read post]