Search for: "Sweat v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
  Although the United States pretty well rejected database protection in the Supreme Court’s Feist v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jon Litscher, Kelli Willard West, Gary Boughton, Samuel Appau (Prisoner Rights – Sweat Lodge)Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
  In the post 9/11 world the men and women in the United States Navy and United States Coast Guard are on call twenty-four hours a day monitoring commercial and private vessels on the high seas. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yellowbear from the special protective unit to the sweat lodge and back is “unduly burdensome. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
 The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its CTM IMPULSE (which seem to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray) the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As an overlay, the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) of 1978 announced the United States policy to “protect and preserve for American Indians their inherent right of freedom to believe, express, and exercise the traditional religions. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Courtney Minick
Data generally cannot be copyrighted in the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Courtney Minick
Data generally cannot be copyrighted in the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Now before the United States Supreme Court and supported by anti-LGBTQ groups, and the United States Department of Justice, the bakery argues that it has a First Amendment right to discriminate based on the owner’s religious beliefs. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 6:17 pm
 . conclusions" of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]