Search for: "Sweeten v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am by Larry
Let’s look at the facts of United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In Daniels v State of NSW in 2015, she had ruled that the satisfaction of the element of reasonableness was one for the jury. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Task Force has already seen results, facilitating voluntary local reforms, and it takes on even greater importance in the wake of the Wayfair v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1: Sales Tax Treatment of Food is Haphazard in State Tax Codes Unequal Treatment of Groceries, Candy, and Soda in State Tax Codes as of January 1, 2018 State State General Sales Tax Grocery Treatment Candy Treated the Same as Groceries? [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
English courts have stated more clearly that Art 8 does not protect corporate reputation (Euromoney Institutional Investor Plc v Aviation News Ltd at [20]), and also seem suspicious of the idea that it is protected by A1P1 (Ajinomoto Sweeteners V Asda Stores Ltd at [29]). [read post]
The District Court found Plaintiff’s argument depended on a broad reading of the Third Circuit’s decision in Kaufman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
That was the question the Sixth Circuit had to answer in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
Generally, these policies are aimed specifically at combating obesity and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.[26] The stated goal of the Ph [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
  They are accused of leading customers to believe that they offer Splenda-brand sweetener when they do not. [read post]