Search for: "Swift Company v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 2:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
He described the importance of standardization for all mobile companies and the benefits for companies to deploy quickly into the market and rely less on suppliers. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
Robertson v Swift, heard 19 March 2014. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
[iii] SWIFT is a global financial messaging service. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
EPA <> CEOs Managing $1.2T Want Climate Action Now - (Bloomberg)The bosses of 43 companies including Ikea, Dow Chemical Co. and HSBC Holdings Plc called for swift action on climate change, a sign businesses are prepared for a United Nations deal this year on limiting fossil fuel emissions. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:23 am
Unlike in the United States, where the enforcement of an injunction may be stayed if the defendant establishes irreparable harm and generates significant doubt about whether the court below got it right, the standard in Germany is pretty one-dimensional: short of the possibility of a company going bankrupt, only the likelihood of success on the merits determines whether a motion for an enforcement stay is granted.The lower Munich court even states in a document… [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am
Circuit Has recently faced in the dispute between Spanski Enterprises v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:34 pm
From an administrative law standpoint, this case is potentially significant because it could clarify the Court's demarcation in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
Prohibition of SWIFT transactions with select Russian banks: Member States also agreed to prohibit the provision of specialised financial messaging services, which are used to exchange financial data (SWIFT), to select Russian banks, including: Bank Otkritie, Novikombank, Promsvyazbank, Rossiya Bank, Sovcombank, VEB, and VTB Bank. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:42 am
(For those who are interested, United States v. [read post]
