Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 41 - 60 of 4,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
Sept. 3, 2021) The post Online ‘Diatribe’ Over a Birthday Cake Isn’t Protected by Anti-SLAPP Law–Woodhill Ventures v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
They also know that every single individual consumer isn't going to sign up for arbitration. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:32 pm by Eric
A jury isn’t going to like a shill bidder, but a Tennessee jury isn’t going to like a Silicon Valley bully beating up on a hometown employer either. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 1:44 pm by Trey Pauley
  A good follow-up step is to determine whether the transaction qualifies as a consumer transaction. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:30 am by Eric Goldman
In fact, star ratings have routinely been protected by Section 230, see, e.g., Gentry v. eBay (from 2002!) [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
In 2010, the US Supreme Court ruled against a California law which prohibited class action bans in consumer arbitration agreements (AT&T v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up a major case involving funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was formed in response to the 2008 financial crisis. [read post]