Search for: "T. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,931
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
Regardless of whether the district court received evidence on that question, and irrespective of what it might have purported to "find" about the topic, the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
Many courts, including the District of Columbia, have rejected the expansion of conversion claims to intangible property, except in limited circumstances where the property represents or “merges with” a tangible item, such as a paper document. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
By Atreya Mathur In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
So, we have three states and the District of Columbia in play. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia held in Protect the Public’s Trust v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
[I]t has responded to antisemitism with at best deliberate indifference....Columbia Spectator reports on the lawsuit. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:44 am
The issue is significant, though it is neither more nor less significant than when Special Prosecutor Jack Smith brought it to the Supreme Court for decision before the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the regulation. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
Mehta said Feb. 23 for the US District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
Larry Kramer, a widely respected legal scholar and historian who was my constitutional law professor at N.Y.U. 20 years ago, called it quits in 2008, on the heels of the Supreme Court's divisive decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Smith has explained, under District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
They don’t do any good and only weaken the prestige of the Court. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
H/t: H-Law.In the New Yorker: "The Ghost of Bush v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
After Murphy, 38 states and the District of Columbia legalized sports gambling. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
I won’t rehash all of those arguments here. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
An exception might exist where a proposed reading of the text is so odd or extreme that, if that were actually the correct reading of the text, someone almost certainly would have mentioned it (a "dog-that-didn't-bark" inference). [read post]
