Search for: "TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 41 - 60
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
District Court for the District of Columbia 2013). [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In the case of the Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
The former op-ed editor of the Columbia student newspaper explained the atmosphere. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Currently, twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have general and/or health care FCA statutes with qui tam provisions, and another six have FCA statutes without qui tam provisions. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:38 am
District of Columbia and involves a challenge by six, law-abiding individuals to the gun control laws in the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
District Court for the District of Columbia ruling that the government of Syria is liable for the death of war correspondent Marie Colvin. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court did have jurisdiction over the defendant without needing to declare a mistrial. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court did have jurisdiction over the defendant without needing to declare a mistrial. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:34 am
District of Columbia, posted today. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Earl Butz, Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, et al., http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/511/331/399042/>, United State Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
In New York Magazine, John Heilemann makes the case for the appointment of Judge Merrick Garland of the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:14 am
Twitter and Taylor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Courts of Appeals for the 9th and District of Columbia Circuits have held, and as the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:49 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
The second is the date of their seniority with respect to their coworkers at the private enterprise at the time of the takeover.Collective bargaining agreements: As noted earlier, another difficulty may arise as a result of an employer's efforts to comply with "layoff provisions" contained in a Taylor Law agreement.As the Plattsburgh decision indicates, [Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045], statutory seniority rights for the purposes of layoff may neither be… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm
Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm v. [read post]
