Search for: "THE I-69 ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT" Results 41 - 60 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
  I worked on several document review projects in the past, and they have always been rather boring. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:52 am
Judith Beheading Holofernes Pix Credit HERE I am delighted to announce the posting of a paper, The Semiotics of Consent and the American Law Institute’s Reform of the Model Penal Code’s Sexual Assault Provisions. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
  As one example, U.S. prosecutors have said that Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández and his brother Juan Antonio “Tony” Hernández play lead roles “[i]n a violent, state sponsored drug trafficking conspiracy. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
The report projects that by year end 2013, there may have been as many as 31 failed banks this year. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 1:01 pm
The British Columbia Law Institute has a Probate Rules Revision Project. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:58 am by Robert Ambrogi
The Knapp/Dayton book sells for $69, while the Kennedy/Shields book is $34.95 (or $19.95 for LPM Section members).In the interest of full disclosure, let me say at the outset that all of these authors are acquaintances of mine and that Amy Knapp and I have worked together as colleagues on several legal-marketing projects over the years. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Elena Chachko
In this post, I consider the UN’s claim that a UNDP official charged with assisting Hamas should be granted immunity from prosecution. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:59 am by ACC Guest Blogger
Also, I would welcome if the results could be presented in more detail and if median values could be included as well. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:10 am
 I will also be presenting reports to the Council on my country visits to Mongolia, which I visited in September, and to Uruguay, which I saw last April. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 5:04 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
This blog post is part of an ongoing project to report on older cases I wasn’t able to get to previously. [read post]
The appellant filed a petition for writ of mandate and argued that the project did not qualify for the infill exemption because (1) the 12-acre project site listed in the original documents exceeded the project size criterion available under the exemption, and (2) the project fell within the scope of the unusual circumstances exception. [read post]