Search for: "THE STATE OF TEXAS v. DAVID MORALES "
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
The Alabama case upheld a state law banning the sale of sexual devices as a danger to public morality. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Medellin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Mostly owner-favorable and Goliath over David, which may seem surprising. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
” David Savage of the Los Angeles Times reported on Justice Anthony Kennedy’s separate opinion regarding solitary confinement in Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Long, The Constitutionality and Ethics of Execution-Day Prison Chaplaincy, [Abstract], 21 Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights 1-33 (2015).Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Unconscionable War on Moral Conscience (reviewing Robert P. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:53 pm
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of United Retired Firefighters Association and The American Legion Department of CaliforniaAmicus brief of Foundation for Moral LawAmicus brief of American Center for Law and Justice et al.Amicus brief of Texas et al.Amicus brief of David EpsteinAmicus brief of Family Research Council et al.Amicus brief of Rear Admiral Jeremiah Denton, USN (Ret.) et al.Motion of Pacific Justice Institute to withdraw motion to intervene and for leave to… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
The new rules state that any employer can be exempted from the mandate based on its “sincerely held religious beliefs” or “moral convictions” that are inconsistent with providing insurance for contraceptive services. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:18 pm
The former statute had been held unconstitutional by Judge David Hittner in Moore v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 2:04 pm
Yet I can’t see any reason why, for example, one would believe judges would be especially good at figuring out the right balance between the acknowledged state interest in preserving human life and the “fundamental right” to terminate pregnancy, as the Supreme Court has been doing since Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am
Naturally, there are many differences between the Texas attack and the incident in Alaska (for instance, between claims of moral responsibility and claims of legal responsibility). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm
See Wallace v. [read post]
