Search for: "THE STATE v. DEMPSEY" Results 41 - 60 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:33 am by Rick Houghton
Although the armed forces could employ this prohibition to restrain retirees’ political speech, the government has only initiated court-martial proceedings against one retired service member—nearly one hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am by Raffaela Wakeman
General Dempsey said that “We still retain significant investment and significant influence. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
"  Nor will the information sought in any forthcoming subpoenas be "pertinent" to any "stated legislative purpose. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 5:48 am by Christiana Wayne
Christiana Wayne shared the Supreme Court’s ruling in Van Buren v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]