Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM" Results 41 - 60 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Guam is not prevented from seeking compensation from the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2021, 2:02 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
SUPREME COURT BP PLC, et al. v Mayor and City of BaltimoreThe issue the court confronted was a procedural matter: Can the defendant energy companies use the federal removal statutes (see 28 USC Section 1442) to remove a state law climate change lawsuit to federal court? [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:39 pm
By Jeffrey Karp, Senior Counsel, and Edward Mahaffey, Law Clerk On May 24, 2021, in an opinion written by Justice Thomas, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that Guam’s lawsuit against the US Navy was not barred by CERCLA, thus restoring the Territory’s claim for recovery of costs to remediate a dumpsite the Navy had created, operated and used beginning in the 1940s. [read post]
25 May 2021, 11:18 am by Robert Percival
ShareJust four weeks after hearing oral argument, the Supreme Court on Monday issued a refreshingly clear, unanimous decision in Guam v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:45 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: An Inmate Who Sought Execution By Firing Squad Loses Supreme Court Appeal (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Top Court Revives Guam’s Superfund Cost Claim Against U.S. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:00 am
Less than a month after hearing oral arguments, the United States Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Guam v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:32 am by Robert Percival
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday sided with Guam in its dispute with the federal government over the cleanup costs of toxic waste on the island. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:41 am by Oyez Project
ShareOyez has posted the aligned audio and transcripts from the April and May 2021 oral arguments at the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Monday morning read: Supreme Court Eyes Rich Activists, Their Anonymous Donations And Tax Breaks (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Guam Brings Long-Running Superfund Debate to Supreme Court (Sylvia Carignan & Ellen Gilmer, Bloomberg Law) Supreme Court poised for another historic spring (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) Vaccinated justices pose for Supreme Court photo with new Justice Barrett (Devin Dwyer, ABC News)… [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Robert Percival
ShareOn Monday the Supreme Court will hear a dispute between the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
In the last five years, the Law of the Territories has experienced a resurgence of activity before the Supreme Court not seen since the Insular Cases, a series of controversial decisions from the early 1900s that endorsed the United States's annexation and governance of its colonies. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:38 pm by Bridget Crawford
In the last five years, the Law of the Territories has experienced a resurgence of activity before the Supreme Court not seen since the Insular Cases, a series of controversial decisions from the early 1900s that endorsed the United States’s annexation and governance of its colonies. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm by Vanessa L. Williams
The law was a frontal assault on our constitutional rights — in fact, the government of Guam argued that the right to abortion did not even apply to Guam at all — and was the most restrictive ban enacted in the United States since the Supreme Court had decided Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:40 am by Alexa Kolbi-Molinas
Indeed, we don’t need to wait for the Supreme Court to act to see a post-Roe world here in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:56 am by James Romoser
Supreme Court shuns election-related disputes (Lawrence Hurley, Reuters) Supreme Court Rebuffs Bid for Universal Vote-by-Mail in Texas (Greg Stohr, Bloomberg) Supreme Court to Tackle Superfund Liability at Guam Landfill (Sylvia Carignan, Bloomberg Law) Infographic on Uzuegbunam v. [read post]