Search for: "THOMAS v. SAUL" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
   Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
There was one other decision, Miller v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:34 am by Andrew Ramonas
Harper, who represented the plaintiffs in the American Indian trust funds lawsuit, Cobell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:41 am by Howard Wasserman
Friday, February 3 Panel I: Judicial Decisionmaking (Mentor: Lee Epstein) Margaret Thomas, The Federalism Canons of Statutory Interpretation as a Constraint on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Nancy Leong, Making Remedies Elizabeth McCuskey, Clarity and Clarification: Grable Federal Questions in the Eyes of Their Beholders Paul Gugliuzza, Patent Law's Uniformity Principle and the Consequences of Judicial Specialization  Panel II: Judicial Capacity and Executive Action (Mentor:… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Gordon Firemark
Dora the Explorer Suit settled Supreme Court Denies Cert in Harper (innocent infringer) file sharing case Maverick Recordings v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:23 am
Saul Margules, Petitioners,v.Paul BROWN, William Fanaly, Charles Thomas, Gary Riggs, Robert Orlikowski, and Scott Way, Respondents.No. 08-1375.May 6, 2009. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Saul Margules (collectively referred to as "defendants") under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0254p.06 2007/07/10 Hartman v. [read post]