Search for: "TIFFANY MAYS V. THE STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
Whether a supplier "knows or has reason to know" was tried before Judge Sullivan in Tiffany v eBay in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:15 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
On 26 May 2021 Nicklin J heard the libel case of Bindel v PinkNews Media Group Ltd. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:10 pm
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am
Human Rights chief Michelle Bachelet has said, adding that many of the violations it is verifying since the Russian invasion may amount to war crimes. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:45 am
Divya Taneja and Tiffany Quach On March 16, 2018, the D.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Regardless, the attorney for Tiffany's said that his client may appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:36 pm
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
And that omission, Stuart contended, was inconsistent with Bullcoming v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:42 am
See Craig v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:38 am
A federal judge in New York May 23 ordered the Bank of China to freeze the assets of alleged counterfeiters in China and to turn over information on credit card transactions involving those firms (Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Brinkley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
United States and Thole v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then summarized the case law regarding the required proof:In addition, according to case-law, although it must be proved that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use throughout the European Union, the same types of evidence do not have to be provided in respect of each Member State (...).Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that there was insufficient proof of distinctive character acquired through use of a mark throughout the European Union where evidence was… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:13 am
American Soc. for Testing & Materials v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:58 am
’ Again, as already stated, this amendment reinforces that the policy that only ‘famous’ marks, such as ‘Tiffany,’ are the types of marks which may claim dilution, as this protection bars almost any other use of the mark or modified mark by persons other than the owner. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:36 am
United States, which may or may not clarify the difference between "true threats" and speech protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
