Search for: "TITLE COURT SERVICES, INC." Results 41 - 60 of 3,670
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am by Rob Robinson
Supreme Court has termed collusive cartel conduct as the ‘supreme evil of antitrust. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Blackwell Security Services Religious Discrimination Litigation Settlement The settlement with Blackwell Security Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm by Peter J. Stuhldreher, Paul M. Knettel
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc., No. 23-20035, the court found that the former employee, Jennifer Harris, was only entitled to $248,619.57 — less than 0.1% of the original verdict — largely because (1) Harris’ Section 1981 claim was barred by the six-month limitation period she agreed to in her employment contract with FedEx and (2) Harris’ remaining Title VII claim was subject to a $300,000 statutory cap on damages. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am by Scott Hervey
On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided on Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
The brief was styled as in support of neither party, but the clear import of the brief is that the Supreme Court should disqualify Trump from the ballot. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:00 pm by Rob Robinson
This transition challenges longstanding norms in legal services where shareholder returns have often taken precedence over client needs and service quality. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am by Ashley Morgan
When the FDA approves a drug for sale in the United States, the FDA includes a section in the drugs package insert titled "Indications for Use. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
The best answer for why the lower courts granted Chevron deference in these cases is that the entire string of Chevron caselaw distracts courts from what should be the most fundamental inquiry in any administrative law case: How much power did Congress delegate to the agency? [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Stegall, 653 F.2d 180, 185–86 (5th Cir. 1981) (permitting plaintiffs to proceed pseudonymously because the lawsuit revealed their unpopular personal beliefs); Choice, Inc. of Tex. v. [read post]