Search for: "Tam v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:03 pm
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:29 pm
The court noted that the Fifth Circuit had, in Riley v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:52 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:29 am
From Justia: In qui tam action, the plaintiff must be a licensed lawyer or represented by a lawyer. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
The Northern District of Illinois approved the $28.5 million final settlement of the action styled US ex rel. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:36 am
Wildhirt v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:43 am
Davis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 11:29 am
Fowler v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:29 pm
Nor do "state officers and entities" qualify as a qui tam person "when they act as an 'arm of the state.'" [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
Landis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:33 pm
In United States ex rel Stone v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:49 pm
May v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:49 pm
May v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:15 pm
The post “DOJ must intervene to dismiss FCA qui tam suits, Supreme Court says U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
Tam tomorrow, January 18, 2016. [read post]