Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 13 December 2018 Master Giddens gave an ex tempore judgment in the slander claim of Kenny v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29978-20 Abdelrahman v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 29766-20 Cohen v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 28966-20 Harrison v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 8 Hospitals (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 28402-20 Jamalli v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 12214-20… [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 3:25 pm
The landmark New York Times v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
In favor of the convicted or condemned Jarrod Taylor v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 6:13 pm
Commissioner of Correction, while doing just that. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) issued a formal reprimand to the NHS in Lanarkshire for reportedly sharing patient data over WhatsApp. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
In Girao v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
IPSO The Daily Express has flagged up a Brexit story correction on its front page for the second time within a week, following an IPSO ruling. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
The Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur(1976) 4 SCC 124 this court held that the doctrine of stare decisis is a very valuable principle of precedent which cannot be departed from unless there are extraordinary or special reasons to do so. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Last Week in the Courts On Wednesday 25 October 2023 there was a committal hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Steyn J. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Ash v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
