Search for: "Taylor v. Gross"
Results 41 - 60
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Katfriend Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (University of Cambridge, King’s College and Max Planck Institute), kindly hosted by Eleonora, investigates those really questions in this post.* Galileo sees stars as ESA logo marches on Jeremy reports on the General Court of the European Union’s decision in Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:49 am
” Whereas, in the case of large-scale infringement “a person may be convicted of gross copyright infringement or gross trademark infringement and sent to prison for at least six months and not more than six years”. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am
Gross, the challenge to Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol, continue. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:44 am
(quoting Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:41 am
Taylor, 469 F.3d 67, 81 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting Meinhard v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
BackgroundAs I suggested several months ago, Lanier v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
Taylor, ___, N.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:29 pm
The inset photo is of the US Courthouse for the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in Little Rock, home to Bankruptcy Judges Evans, Mixon and Taylor. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 10:51 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
In Bly v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Polk, No. 072425 Sentence of fifteen years and eight months incarceration for attempting to produce child pornography is affirmed where: 1) there was no gross disproportionality between the fifteen-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment established by 18 U.S.C. section 2251(e) and the offense of which the defendant was convicted; and 2) the defendant's Eighth Amendment challenge failed. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm
Gross Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 08a0454p.06 USA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm
Gross Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 08a0454p.06 USA v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The failure, he argued, constituted gross negligence, willful misconduct, prima facie tort, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and a violation of the equal protection clause. [read post]
