Search for: "Taylor v. New Line Industries"
Results 41 - 60
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Hayes, Esq., New York, NY, MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A., By: Clay M. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
deals with the issues The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd began this week before Moulder J. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Instagram is leaving users of its embed feature twisting in the wind (also rejecting a fair use defense on a motion to dismiss though leaving open a little room for a different result later; in the unlikely event that the Supreme Court says something about the relationship between common industry beliefs and fair use, that could bear on the outcome) Skidmore and progeny: While 2019 might have been the peak year for finding musical work infringement based on stylistic similarities—both… [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(IP Whiteboard) Summary judgment Delta blow: Virgin Atlantic Airways v Delta Air Lines [2011] EWCA Civ 162; and Virgin Atlantic Airways v Premium Aircraft Interiors (IPKat) Half a million PCC damages cap likely from 14 June (PatLit) Pioneers, pirates and parvenus – IP v Innovation (IPKat) Rockwool fire ads held unlawful: EWHC (Ch) decision in trademark dispute Kingspan Group plc v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am
Taylor (1908). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:05 pm
VaporDNA, Case 1:20-cv-02294-JGK in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Cruz v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
”[13] Egilman and his minions revolted, but Taylor & Francis held the line and retired the journal.[14] Egilman recovered from the indignity foisted upon him by Taylor & Francis, by finding yet another journal, the Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity (JOSPI).[15] Egilman probably said all that was needed to describe the goals of this new journal by announcing that the Journal’s “partner” was the Collegium Ramazzini. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am
In the wake of the Blurred Lines decision, and the more recent Taylor [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
His business partner, Matthew Taylor, cared for two registered qualifying patients. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Should courts accommodate industry expectations? [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Circuit ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Astley v. [read post]
