Search for: "Teague v. Lane"
Results 41 - 60
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Court’s jurisdiction rested on an exception to the non-retroactivity of new rules.In Teague v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:27 am
Citing its 1989 precedent in Teague v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Kentucky and Teague v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Despite the apparent clarity of this “rule,” the Court’s decision in Teague v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Lane. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
” The Court noted that in Teague v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Jeanette Turner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:00 pm
Montgomery confirms that: Teague [v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
The process that the Court uses to decide whether to make one of its criminal law rulings retroactive, to closed cases, dates from its 1989 ruling in Teague v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:10 am
Lane provides a floor (Montgomery) but not a ceiling (Danforth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:24 pm
They could be referring to the procedural default rule, the anti-retroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), because a claim of systemic delay wasn't dictated by the holdings in Furman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:31 pm
The majority decided the issue under the rule of Teague v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
Lane says the rule is not retroactive. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm
The state’s highest court turned him down again, having decided in earlier cases that it would apply the Teague v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In a recent article, Perry Moriearty argued that Miller was a substantive change to the law and thus qualifies for one of Teague v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989)? [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989)? [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Lane (1989) and Coleman v. [read post]
