Search for: "Teamsters Local v. Labor Board"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
The plaintiffs in this case claim that nonmembers are still forced to pay 79 and 98 percent, respectively, of what full members of AFSCME and the Teamsters/Professional & Technical Employees Local Union are required to pay. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
Charges filed by Teamsters Local 245; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1), (3), (4), and (5). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
NLRB v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
(The case is National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
Accordingly, the Board dismissed the petition filed by Petitioner Teamsters Local 984. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
Along with AFSCME, the lawsuit named the Teamsters/Professional and Technical Employees Local Union as a defendant, stating that the union charges nonmembers 79% and 98% respectively, of what they would charge for members. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am
NLRB, which involved a dispute between a Pepsi-Cola bottling and distribution company and the union representing the plant employees, Teamsters Local 760. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The Petitioner is Teamsters Local 215. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:58 am
The appeals court agreed with the NLRB that because the employer’s short-lived threat didn’t materially affect negotiations during the lockout, an order requiring the employer to desist from future threats and to post a notice promising its employees that much was a sufficient remedy (Teamsters Local Union No. 455 v NLRB, August 27, 2014, Gorsuch, N). [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:25 pm
Charges filed by Teamsters Local 404M; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Charges filed by Teamsters Local 92; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Charge filed by Teamsters Local 177; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:07 pm
Karl v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
Charges filed by Teamsters Local 604; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1), (2), and (3). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:40 am
A Teamsters local petitioned the NLRB to organize the drivers at FedEx Freight’s terminal in Stockton, California, at which the company employs 50 truck drivers and 27 dockworkers, who use forklifts to load and unload trucks at the terminal. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
National Labor Relations Board Docket: 08-1457 Argument date: Will be set for argument in March or April 2010 Question presented: An administrative body known as the National Labor Relations Board makes rulings on federal labor law. [read post]
