Search for: "Thames v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
Romano v NY Presbyterian (2006)). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Thame, 846 F.2d 200, 205-08 (3d Cir. 1988); United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.Starting at 2 pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “When you do nothing or you can’t do anything – acquiescence and other modern challenges in trade mark… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
(The ‘exceptional needs or circumstances’ reference is to Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 7 (our note)). [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:41 am
 The facts were as stated in our previous note. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:03 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:52 pm
I love my river, but I’m not entirely confident about what Thames Water might have put in it. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
On the reasonable length of time to be provided for the claimant to find alternative accommodation, Conville v Richmond Upon Thames [2006] 1 WLR 2808 provides that it is for the Council to decide what is a reasonable opportunity. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
On the reasonable length of time to be provided for the claimant to find alternative accommodation, Conville v Richmond Upon Thames [2006] 1 WLR 2808 provides that it is for the Council to decide what is a reasonable opportunity. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
USA: Skidmore v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
The appellants had relied upon the view of May J in Summers v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames [2018] EWHC 782 (Admin), [2018] 1 WLR 4729, at [24], that the expression “those in the locality” in section 59 of the 2014 Act “must be read to include those who regularly visit or work in the locality, in addition to residents”. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
The ICO have reprimanded the Thames Valley Police for publishing the details of witnesses to a person suspected of a crime, forcing the witness to have to relocate. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
Dobson & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Ltd (No 2) [2011] EWHC 3253 (TCC) (08 Dece…. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
