Search for: "Thames v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 12:01 am
His father, Benjamin Harrison V, was a delegate to the Continental Congress who signed the Declaration of Independence. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
This post is not a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 3453/2002 (2016) (“the Entry Tax case”). [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
This post is not a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 3453/2002 (2016) (“the Entry Tax case”). [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:03 pm
State v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am
The decision letter addressed the Mohammed criteria (R v Camden LBC exp Mohammed (1997) 30 HLR 315). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 1:26 pm
Enfield LBC v Najim (2015) CA (Civ Div) 04/03/2015 [Note on Lawtel and here. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
Johnson v Steele, heard 29 October 2014 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am
While the statement of reasons in this case gives a clear basis for the decision, there is no address to the Upper Tribunal case of TD v SSWP and London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames (HB) 2013 UKUT 642 AAC or the finding on the meaning of ‘occupy’ in the regulations in R (Marchant) v Swale Borough Council HBRB [2000] 1 FLR 246. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
There was a suggestion drawn from Banks v Kingston upon Thames RLBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1443 about when a decision about homelessness becomes deficient, but, as Jackson LJ, said, althoughit is tempting to use that by analogy: Tempting but wrong. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 1:38 pm
: For the criminal law prof: Winiarz v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
That offer was contained in a letter which stated that: [W]e only have to offer you accommodation once. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
That offer was contained in a letter which stated that: [W]e only have to offer you accommodation once. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:10 am
In the controversial 2005 case of Kelo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Consider it a replay of that old Hume v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
