Search for: "The Entire Sixth Circuit Panel of Federal Officers"
Results 41 - 60
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
Indeed, the meaning of “it” is so clear that Judge Gregory simply excises that inoffensive pronoun entirely and conveniently substitutes “ban Muslims. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 12:30 pm
No dice on the occupants' federal constitutional claims, declares the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:45 pm
Sixth Circuit: No qualified immunity for two of the officers. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
(We discussed the original panel decision on the podcast.) [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Tenth Circuit: Illegal arrest and malicious prosecution are not claims that can be brought against federal officers. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:00 pm
Which is constitutional, according to the en banc Sixth Circuit. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
The Sixth Circuit’s Analysis in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: Which was erroneous. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: This is perfectly acceptable. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:30 am
Circuit Scorecard: The seventy-one merits cases for the Term hail from each of the eleven geographic circuits, the D.C. and Federal Circuits, five states, and one three-judge district court panel. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am
The government sought rehearing en banc, and the entire Eleventh Circuit reversed the panel on this issue. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
In a parallel Sixth Circuit challenge, the Sixth Circuit held that the new statute saved the Authority; meanwhile, the Fifth Circuit remanded to the district court for further consideration. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 1:54 pm
Sixth Circuit: Now on habeas review, we can't say that trying again would amount to cruel and unusual punishment or double jeopardy. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:48 pm
In Watters itself, the issue was whether the OCC could preempt state regulation of national banks' operating subsidiaries, and the Court affirmed decisions of the Second, Fourth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits, all answering that question in the affirmative (although, as I noted at the time, the Court adopted the Ninth Circuit's Chevron-free analysis, rather than the Chevron-laden views of the other three circuits). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
” (15 n.3) This contrasts with the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm
The Tamoxifen Rule Is Unprecedented and Conflicts With the Approaches of the Sixth Circuit, the Eleventh Circuit, and the Federal Trade Commission The Tamoxifen rule is far outside the mainstream of judicial and academic analysis of exclusionary settlements. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
Following the decision in Rehaif, a panel of the 4th Circuit held on remand that Gary was entitled to a new proceeding. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
The Sixth Circuit has such a rule, observes Lynch. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:18 am
The Sixth Circuit agreed with the district court that Lane’s speech was not protected. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am
Jackson, 825 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc), in which the en banc Fifth Circuit overturned a Fifth Circuit panel decision and applied the good faith exception for reliance on its panel decision. [read post]
