Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Mitchell" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
  Unlike certain fish-fry establishments, the Court can be very generous about repeat visits to its all-you-can-eat relist bar:  up for a seventh helping since the Court denied the petitioner in forma pauperis status is Fairey v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
” | Williams Mullen – bit.ly/yVP7EM (Monica McCarroll, Stephen Anthony) Ooops, They Did it Again – Jurors Continue to Improperly Use Internet, and Courts Struggle with Solutions – bit.ly/wmffPX (Gibbons) Pippins Court Affirms Need for Cooperation and Proportionality in eDiscovery – bit.ly/AuGsUO (Philip Favro) Planning is Key in Corporate Fraud Risk Management – bit.ly/x02ZBG (Catherine Dunn) SOPA and PIPA Have Been Shelved | eDiscovery Law Alert –… [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am by Mandelman
District Court for the Southern District of Florida charging attorney Mitchell J. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
On August 6, 2009, Florida prosecutors charged Feldman with one count of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:23 am by Robert C. Weill
 The Court accepted the case for review based on conflict with the Court’s prior decision in Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell P.A. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Feb. 11, 2009) (applying exception in Florida statute to reject personal injury-based consumer fraud claim); Gorran v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm by cdw
Still reading Alfred Brian Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
 In fact, a few years back in Poindexter v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 6:57 pm by Richard Hornsby
State of Florida, 817 So.2d 799 (Fla.2002); and State of Florida v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:03 am
 barred under federal law from buying a gun  ...NEW YORK, USA (79%); VIRGINIA,  . [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mastromatteo, No. 06-2349 Denial of defendant's motion for a Franks hearing and his sentence for drug-related offenses are affirmed where: 1) defendant's failure to obtain a written conditional plea was not a jurisdictional bar to the circuit court's hearing the appeal; 2) the district court did not err in holding that defendant lacked standing to contest a search of [read post]