Search for: "The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2009, 10:09 am by admin
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, 129 S.Ct. 846, 2009, the Supreme Court effectively expanded the class of individuals able to state a claim of retaliation in the Sixth Circuit from those who actually initiate a complaint of discriminatory conduct to include those individuals who simply identify discriminatory behavior while responding to an employer’s inquiry. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:43 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, No. 06-1595 (Argued October 8, 2008; decided January 26, 2009). [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595Title VII/retaliation: (From SCOTUSwiki): The Court unanimously concluded that the ordinary meaning of "oppose" includes giving a "disapproving account" of unlawful behavior, even if the employee takes no further action on her own to seek to stop or remedy the conduct. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:09 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee held that the Civil Rights Act's Title VII antiretaliation provision's protection extends to an employee who speaks out about discrimination in answering questions during an employer's internal investigation. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:28 pm
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, finally applied federal whistleblower laws to in-house employer investigations. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:10 pm
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, (MD TN, Feb. 5, 2009), among other things requires Nashville to appoint an FHA and RLUIPA Compliance Officer. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 7:39 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
Employee protected by Title VII if he or she suffers retaliation by the employer after reporting workplace race or gender discriminationCrawford v Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee, US Supreme Court, No. 06-1595, decided January 26, 2009The genesis of this ruling was an internal investigation into rumors of sexual harassment of employees by the Metro School District Employee Relations Director. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE and the opinion is here. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, Case No. 06-1595. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:11 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, the Supreme Court has been asked to assess whether the anti-retaliation provisions under Title VII extend protection to employees who participate in an employer’s internal investigation. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 10:55 pm
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:28 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tenn., 06-1595, arose when a payroll coordinator for Nashville, Vicky Crawford, was fired in 2003 after 30 years of dedicate employment. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Plaintiff-Appellant Brian Petty appeals the district court's summary judgment and judgment on partial findings in favor of Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County ("Metro") on claims that Metro violated his rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA"), 38 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:31 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, and it raises this question: Is an employee who answers questions as a witness in an internal investigation of sexual harassment protected from retaliation? [read post]