Search for: "The People v. James Phillips"
Results 41 - 60
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 pm
Phillips, Nonresident Fellow, Stanford University’s Constitutional Law Center and Josh Blackman, Associate Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law Houston James C. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
[Thanks to James Phillips for the lead.] [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Many religious people are understandably upset when they have to subsidize blasphemy. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Kenneth Rose, Stephen Phillips, Rory Thomson, Morag McClelland, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Tobias Seger and Emma Boffey, all from CMS Scotland. 1604: That ends proceedings for today. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in Senegal,… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In a short opinion written by Judge James Ho, the court concluded that Wittmer had failed to prove she experienced discrimination because of her transgender status. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
By barring the Archdiocese from doing so, WMATA’s policy discriminates against religious viewpoints,,,,[Thanks to James Phillips for the lead.] [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm
The architecture is rich and varied, the people are warm and friendly. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 9:35 pm
Supreme Court this term, Gundy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:48 am
ZS v DP on issue of mens rea in unlawful carnal knowledge. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:40 am
Time Magazine asked seven historians for suggestions of people for President Trump to pardon. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, law student James Hannaway finds the result in China Agritech v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:48 pm
Berg is the James L. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, James Gottry maintains that “[t]he Supreme Court’s decision simply clarifies that the government may not show hostility toward people of faith. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 1:48 am
Phillips, 477 F.3d 215, 220-21 (5th Cir. 2007). [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 4:02 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ruled in Jesner v. [read post]
