Search for: "The United States of America v. The State of Alaska et al"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
"I'm a United States circuit judge. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Fresh produce contaminated during cultivation, harvesting, processing, and distribution has also been a source of hepatitis A (Butot et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003; Fiore, 2004; Hutin, et al., 1999; Wheeler, et al., 2005). [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
It was Campa, et al., v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
Iowa and Alaska are but two examples of such other states that have commissioned multiple-year programs to study the effects of cameras in the courtroom. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Financial Institution Employees of America Local 1182 (Seattle-First), 475 U.S. 192 (1986), the Board examined whether the merger resulted in such a dramatic change to the Union as to alter its identity as the bargaining representative of the Respondent's employees. [read post]
