Search for: "Thomas v. News World Communications" Results 41 - 60 of 838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
As the Nobel laureate Ronald Coase taught us, in a world without transaction costs (or if such costs were sufficiently low), age-verification laws or obtaining verifiable parental consent wouldn’t matter. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm by Thomas James
Pot, meet kettle; kettle, pot “False news is harmful to our community, it makes the world less informed, and it erodes trust. . . . [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Copyright theft affecting news publishers in the UK and around the world is “through the roof” as content farmers are thought to be getting ever “more brazen,” the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
New Issued Cases There was one breach of privacy claim, one defamation claim and one miscellaneous claim filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
FOSTA is terrible social policy that hurt multiple communities without clearly benefiting any community, but its bad results don’t automatically make it unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
New Issued Cases There were no new cases issued in the media and communications list last week. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
New Issued Cases There were no new cases issued on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
" Although Smith "laid the groundwork for her new venture, she has yet to carry out her plans. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Smith could have filed (and still can file) some charges in DC or New Jersey. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
New Issued Cases There were no new issued cases in the Media and Communications list last week. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000)), and the Roberts court turned a blind eye, more recently, to racialized policing on the ground and the over-policing of certain communities by permitting searches to be excused even if they were completely unlawful (e.g., in Utah v. [read post]