Search for: "Thompson v. Shock"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Thompson, decided in 1991, was a major victory in the fight to bring some degree of finality to criminal convictions. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 8:09 am
Fred Thompson? [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Monk v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
Thompson, the Connick opinion holds that “a district attorney has no constitutional obli [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by Viral V. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by Viral V. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
” According to the Telegraph, Robert Thompson, 29, convicted for the murder of James Bulger, may pursue legal action over the interception of his voicemails. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
Thompson/Center Arms (and which yours truly argued). [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
If this is truly what the judges believe, their naivete is shocking. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement this week and seven rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 20878-17 Parsons v mirror.co.uk 19747-17 A woman v plymouthherald.co.uk: No breach of Principle 2 – Privacy 19601-17 Goodson v Telegraph.co.uk: No breach of Principle 1 – Accuracy 19508-17 The European Business Assembly v The Times:… [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
This concerned the ruling in the case of 07188-18 Jones v Mail Online, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2018). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
Ferber (1982) ("we have sustained legislation aimed at protecting the physical and emotional well-being of youth even when the laws have operated in the sensitive area of constitutionally protected rights"); Thompson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
The Americans with Disability Act (ADA) can produce some strange results when matters are litigated, and a recent Texas case demonstrates that even if an employer thinks it is doing the right thing it still may be in violation of the law.In City of Houston v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:20 am
In the case of Rivera v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
IPSO 00418-24 Hedges and Baker v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00666-24 Mitchison v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 22422-23 openDemocracy v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 21812-23 Vulliamy v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No… [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
IPSO IPSO has released a number of rulings following our last Round Up: Resolution Statement 08191-19 Thompson v Derby Telegraph, Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO Mediation 04961-19 Cowan V The Herald, Accuracy (2019), no breach – after investigation 08064-18 Gordon v Sunday World, Accuracy (2019) and Privacy (2019), breach – sanction as offered by publication (correction published prominently) Statements in Open Court and Apologies On Monday 11… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
This is because whether or not a punishment is cruel and unusual depends, not on whether its mere mention ‘shocks the conscience and sense of justice of the people,’ but on whether people who were fully informed as to the purposes of the penalty and its liabilities would find the penalty shocking, unjust and unacceptable. [read post]
