Search for: "Three Kings Holdings v. Six."
Results 41 - 60
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2015, 5:42 am
King, 353 N.C. 457, 479 (2001), and whether corroborating evidence exists. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
King the court held that the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance in a post-conviction relief petition was barred by res judicata because he could have raised it on direct appeal… In State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
The last time an executive body (the King’s Privy Council) invalidated an invention patent on an ordinary application was in 1746, in Darby v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
King v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:18 am
The facts in Greaves confirm the wisdom of that holding. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:41 am
Three years ago in American Electric Power v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Anyway, here they are:* A film about Martin Luther King without King's actual words: is it really a copyright problem? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
” Leading its list with Brown, the draft describes three of these occasions in text and 25 more in a two-page footnote. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
Q: Were you surprised by the new Chief Justice’s vote with the majority after she had taken the opposite view in her Court of Appeal opinion in King v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
King, 19-546, and King v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:50 pm
Circuit Judge Paul V. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
In response to an order issued by the California Supreme Court, we consider whether, in light of the holding in People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
This case is no exception.The case is Southerland v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:20 am
Hart Friends of the Kings River v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
The “secular purpose” factor is one of three prongs in the best known approach to adjudication of Establishment Clause challenges, set out in the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Lemon v. [read post]
