Search for: "Timothy Harris v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
One would expect the Court to liberally GVR after a case like Hurst, but the Court evidently was persuaded by the state’s arguments that the Hurst rule made no difference in either Timothy Fletcher or Delmer Smith’s cases. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm by Elina Saxena
The Daily Beast's Shane Harris and Nancy Youssef reveal that an unreleased congressional report suggests that the exchange of Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay was politically motivated. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:03 am by Zack Bluestone
During a speech at Peking University on Tuesday, Admiral Harry Harris refuted the inevitably of a Sino-American clash in the South China Sea, but he also robustly defended continued U.S. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had the Court’s decision in the bankruptcy case Harris v Viegelahn. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
Ryan Sabey received a string of leaks from soldier Paul Brunt, including information about Prince Harry. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm by Michael Cannon
In October 2013, the state of Indiana filed Indiana v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
 Two of the complaints were by members of the Royal Family, Prince Harry and Prince Andrew. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am by WSLL
Justice Voigt respectfully dissented.Case Name: EDWARD VENARD v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am by Travis Casey
  Meanwhile, others abuse the system to receive free money[v] that is administered by one of the most wasteful and ineffective bodies—the American government—which charges a massive administration fee. [read post]