Search for: "Tincher v. Tincher"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
E.g., Tincher, slip op. at 44 (Webb v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 5:32 am
In the case of Lehmann v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
July 29, Dowling, J.); Vinson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 5:40 am
In the case of Massaro v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:07 pm
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has accepted an appeal in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
According to an October 15, 2013 article by Max Mitchell of The Legal Intelligencer (what a great name for a reporter), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
According to an October 15, 2013 article by Max Mitchell of The Legal Intelligencer (what a great name for a reporter), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:49 am
Dec. 22, 2003) (Op. by Mundy, J.), addressed the issue of whether evidence of a product’s compliance with industry and government safety standards is admissible in a strict liability case following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s previous decision in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Tort Talkers may recall from a previous blog post that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has accepted an appeal in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Tort Talkers may recall from a previous blog post that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has accepted an appeal in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Varner v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Thus, we had been speculating that the most likely outcome would be a to vacate and remand after the court decides Tincher v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:00 am
In his recent products liability decision in the case of Bailey v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm
Illinois legislature rams through trial lawyer bills before new governor takes office [Chamber-backed Madison Record: retroactive lifting of statute of limitations on asbestos suits, reduction of jury size from 12 to 6] “The NFL Concussion Settlement: Class Action Exploitation” [Howard Erichson] Thanks to plaintiff-friendly California law, suits over “Made in USA” labels proliferate [WSJ] Fraud complaints related to Hurricane Katrina above 30,000 and more continue… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Dorshimer v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
A New Analysis for Pennsylvania Products Liability Cases Adopted In Tincher v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 4:08 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
July 19, 2019), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas did not commit any error in a products liability case when it instructed the jury on both the consumer expectation test and the risk-utility test that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court established in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Section 8371.The Supreme Court adopted the two-part test enunciated in the case of Terletsky v. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Palmiter v. [read post]
