Search for: "Travel Channel LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2016, 3:36 am
Because there were no restrictions as to channels of trade or classes of consumers in the involved application or registration, the Board presumed that the goods travel in the same, normal channels of trade for those goods, to the same classes of consumers.Since the goods are identical in part, a lesser degree of similarity as to the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:09 am
(quoting In re Accelerate s.a.l., 101 USPQ2d 2047, 2049 (TTAB 2012)).Because the identified goods are legally identical, the Board must presume that they travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:22 am
Since the involve goods are not identical, the Board was correct in not presuming that they travel in the same trade channels. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:34 am
Because the goods overlap, the Board presumed that they travel through the same, normal channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:06 am
Moreover, the Board must presume that the goods travel through the same, normal channels of trade to same classes of consumers. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
RAM Development Associates LLC, Opposition No. 91244891 (April 11, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
28 May 2018, 3:01 pm
Opposer further argued that the parties goods were identical and traveled in the same channels of trade. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:17 am
Gay and lesbian couples from Georgia traveled to other states (where same-sex marriage is legal) and were married there. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:55 am
In re Marshall Brewing Company, LLC, Serial No. 87019347 (April 9, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
4 May 2016, 11:56 am
South Bend, Indiana - An Indiana trademark attorney for Plaintiff Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC of Elkhart, Indiana filed a declaratory judgment lawsuit in the Northern District of Indiana. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:32 am
Of course, because the goods in the application and cited registration are identical, the Board must presume that they travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
The Board presumed that the overlapping goods travel in the same, normal trade channels to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:09 am
demonstrates that Applicant’s and Registrant’s goods travel in similar trade channels and are offered to overlapping classes of consumers, the evidence of record nonetheless is insufficient to show that a single entity provides both Applicant’s and Registrant’s goods under a single mark. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 2:39 am
In re DPC Pet Specialties LLC, Serial No. 86951910 (June 6, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda Kuczma).The Goods: Because the goods are in part identical, those overlapping goods must be presumed to travel through the same, normal channels of trade to the same classes of purchasers. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
"Therefore the Board concluded the involved goods and are likely to travel through the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers, namely, member of the general public who are seeking products to better their fitness and health.Purchaser Sophistication: Applicant contended that consumers will exercise care in their purchasing decisions regarding the involved goods, but it provided no supporting evidence. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:26 am
Because the goods are legally identical (applicant's goods being encompassed by those of the registration), the Board must assume that they travel in the same, normal channels of trade to the same classes of customers.Visionaire urged that its customers are "very savvy," but neither the application nor the registration is contains any limitation as to sophisticated purchasers. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:31 am
" The goods are legally identical, and so the Board presumed that they travel in the same trade channels to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:45 am
The overlap in goods and the presumption that those overlapping goods travel in the same trade channels to the same classes of consumer really put applicant under the gun, so to speak. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:23 am
Since the involved goods are legally identical, the Board must presume that they travel through the same normal channels of trade, to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In re NKKK LLC, Serial No. 90100250 (April 25, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. [read post]
