Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 10:38 am
., et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:30 am
Superior Court, (CA Ct. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:42 am
Nine (14-P-359), a medical malpractice decision in favor of a radiologist was overturned by the Superior Court of Massachusetts. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:00 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:58 am
E..D. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
On March 1, 2016, a Snohomish County Superior Court Judge found that the ferry system had wrongfully denied payment of maintenance and ordered the Washington State Ferry system to pay 275 days of back maintenance to an injured ferry worker represented by Kraft Palmer Davies, P.L.L.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:05 pm
Why wasn't he taken to the Hospital and treated? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:04 am
Holy Spirit Hospital which is now up before the Pennsylvania Superior Court. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
Superior Court (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 8, 13, 25 (Burdick); Walden v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Superior Court ex rel Krescent, S199384 (Cal. [read post]
28 May 2008, 10:07 am
Superior Court. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:00 am
In its ruling, the court accepted the Plaintiff’s argument that the trial court had erred in relying on the case of Rice v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm
Superior Court (Romero), 13 Cal.4th 497, the California Supreme Court held that a Superior Court Judge could strike an allegation or vacate a finding under the Three Strikes law if they saw fit to do so in the interests of justice. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
This post was authored by Liara Silva and Alysha Stein-Manes Last month, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision in Caldecott v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Meanwhile, Mother filed an appeal to the Superior Court on April 26. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
If the Supreme Court next term overrules Chevron USA v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:16 pm
Today's DJ offers a trio of appellate treats. [read post]
9 May 2008, 2:00 pm
Aramark Corp., No. 30-2008-00180008-CU-OE-CXC, the court treated section 203's "wages of the employee [that] shall continue as a penalty" as ordinary wages.In similar fashion to the "additional hour of pay" [in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 9:37 am
S.R.V. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:36 am
It is just not going to happen, as illustrated (yet again) by Judge Bledsoe's decision in County of Catawba v. [read post]
