Search for: "U. S. v. Dec"
Results 41 - 60
of 460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 12:40 pm
Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am
Dec. 644 (2011). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
In Scully v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Fund v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Dee v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Dee v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:33 am
Dec. 11, 2009). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm
Patterson, 357 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
In Wyly v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:03 am
Papers on SSRN with American Indian law subjects, either unpublished or recently published: Agency Pragmatism in Addressing Law’s Failure: The Curious Case of Federal ‘Deemed Approvals’ of Tribal-State Gaming Compacts 52 U. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:47 pm
The opposition document in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm
In his ruling in Chambers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 12:58 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In Boseman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In reaching its conclusion, the BIA compared Matter of Sanchez Sosa, 25 I&N Dec. 807, 815 (BIA 2012), recognizing that a respondent reeking a U-Visa was not entitled to a continuance for dilatory purposes where it was unlikely that the respondent’s U-Visa application would be approved, with Matter of Hashmi, 24 I&N Dec. 785 (BIA 2009), recognizing that a continuance may be warranted where the respondent is the beneficiary of a pending visa… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In reaching its conclusion, the BIA compared Matter of Sanchez Sosa, 25 I&N Dec. 807, 815 (BIA 2012), recognizing that a respondent reeking a U-Visa was not entitled to a continuance for dilatory purposes where it was unlikely that the respondent’s U-Visa application would be approved, with Matter of Hashmi, 24 I&N Dec. 785 (BIA 2009), recognizing that a continuance may be warranted where the respondent is the beneficiary of a pending visa… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Dec. 19, 2011). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:40 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Here's the text, Iancu v. [read post]
