Search for: "U. S. v. Marshall" Results 41 - 60 of 330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Marshals Report of Findings & Recommendations January 19, 2023: “On May 2, 2022, Politico published a copy of the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
It’s not common at all, though, to see business dissolution proceedings play out in matrimonial court, which is why a recent decision from Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Kathleen Waterman-Marshall is so fascinating. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshalls opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court’s recent decision overturning its 1973 decision Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
That example is weak, because the Natelson-Kopel argument simply elucidated Chief Justice Marshall's statement in McCulloch v. [read post]