Search for: "U. S. v. Mckinney" Results 41 - 47 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2009, 11:55 pm
Basic taglines -- unlike the truly famous Just Do It and Don't Leave Home Without It taglines -- have not consistently enjoyed a meaningful scope of protection: For example, in a somewhat similar reverse confusion case, a 2002 opinion from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cohn v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
See also McKinney's Insurance Law § 3103 (a) (even if the policy or provision is "in violation of the requirements or prohibitions of this chapter it shall be enforceable as if it conformed with such requirements or prohibitions"); Trizzano v Allstate Ins. [read post]