Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers"
Results 41 - 60
of 240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Not only would they be the seller/tenant in the transaction, but also the secured lender. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:45 am
The Court's decision today in the Texas SB8 case, Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The case of Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:15 am
" (lovin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
So that’s a bit of a pickle.] [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 7:04 am
Vernum v Freyer 2021 NY Slip Op 50120(U) [70 Misc 3d 1218(A)] Decided on February 11, 2021 Supreme Court, Warren County Muller, J. describes a curious representation and ends with a split decision. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Shah predicted that the Illinois Supreme Court would answer this question by focusing on the exceptions to the general rule that a corporation that purchases another company’s assets is not liable for the seller’s debts. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Part II examines supply chain’s use of letters of intent. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
Now there’s a fourth, Bak v Rostek, 2020 NY Slip Op 33142(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 25, 2020], in which a 47.5% member of a single-asset realty-holding LLC sold his membership interest to the other 52.5% member for around $900,000 based on a $1.9 million valuation assigned by the buying member. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
Panag v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am
That’s the hard lesson learned by the 49% LLC member in Lard-PT, LLC v Seokoh, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51208(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 20, 2020], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok denied the 49% member’s summary judgment motion based on findings that put the 51% member on a winning path. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:13 pm
O’Donnell Haddad LLC, 2016 IL App (2d) 150519‐U, ¶28. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am
Halperin v Van Dam 2020 NY Slip Op 31301(U) April 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652124/2019 Judge: Andrea Masley explains why the attorneys remain in the case. [read post]
16 May 2020, 8:32 pm
Additional Resources: Earth Science Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:32 am
’s representation of plaintiff Dmitry Markov d/b/a Dmitry Markov Coins & Medals in an underlying action, Markov v Spectrum Group Intern., Inc. (2015 NY Slip Op 30054[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2015]). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:56 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
