Search for: "U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals" Results 41 - 60 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2015, 11:38 pm
A very recent Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") ruling gave debtors a little more leverage in how they pay their secured debts in a Chapter 13 "adjustment of debts" case. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 8:24 am
NextGen CM/ECF Release 1.0.1 for the appellate courts and bankruptcy appellate panels will provide enhanced Appellate Attorney Filing. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Circuit misapplied this Court's decision in Holland v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:14 am by Bob Eisenbach
The bankruptcy court granted Tristar summary judgment and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:14 am by Bob Eisenbach
The bankruptcy court granted Tristar summary judgment and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
Today's blog post does this through a recent decision by the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, whose jurisdiction covers California and other western states. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:01 pm by Jordan Bublick
 Case Below - BAP and First Circuit In the case below, the chapter 13 debtor appealed the bankruptcy court's order first to the First Circuit's Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) under both 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
However, in Markosian, the BAP disagreed with divining intent from congressional silence, which the court noted has been cautioned against by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
However, in Markosian, the BAP disagreed with divining intent from congressional silence, which the court noted has been cautioned against by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
However, in Markosian, the BAP disagreed with divining intent from congressional silence, which the court noted has been cautioned against by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  As the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit held: The overwhelming majority of courts, including every circuit that has considered the question, have concluded that the undersecured portion of a secured creditor’s claim should be counted as unsecured debt for § 109(e) purposes. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Of course, one thing you would to is to press the bankruptcy court for all of the approvals and try to complete all of the remaining contingencies, so you can go back to the Ninth Circuit as soon as possible to answer the appellate court’s questions and requests. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:21 pm by Bankruptcy Attorney
The surcharge was upheld on appeal to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am by James H. Wilson, Jr.
District Court also noted decisions from two other circuits, one from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in In re Spong, 661 F.2d. 6 (1981) and one from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Matter of Gwinn, 20 B.R. 233 (1982). [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:42 pm by Bankruptcy Attorney
The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has ruled that penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Service for untimely filing corporate tax returns were not administrative expenses. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:55 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
Mar. 1, 2013), the United States  Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reviewed a bankruptcy court's determination of the "cram down" rate, which is the rate of interest paid after confirmation of a chapter 11 plan on account of a non-consenting secured claim, for clear error. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:52 pm by Bob Eisenbach
  In a footnote, the Ninth Circuit also called out the district court for erroneously holding that it, an Article III court, was bound by a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. [read post]