Search for: "U.S. Department of Labor v. Harris"
Results 41 - 60
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
Bay Mills Indian Community and Harris v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
Cumbie v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Harris (E.D. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:23 pm
Hewitt decision from the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:22 am
See Department of Labor, Interpretative Bulletin No. 4, ¶ 3 (Nov. 1, 1938), cited in Harned, 192 S.W.2d at 380. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
The justices did not reach the union-fees issue the first time they considered it, in the 2014 case Harris v. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
They also discussed Doe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm
* November 16-17, 2012 Keynote Speaker: Professor Erik Olin Wright, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
Department of Labor may also be advancing some notable rules in the next year. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:58 am
Hopkins (1989) 490 U.S. 228; Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:20 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Department of Labor announced a proposed rule to limit miners’ exposure to silica, a carcinogenic dust linked to black lung disease. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
For example, the Department of Labor has taken steps to rescind a Trump-era rule that allows discrimination by federal contractors. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In a case pending at the Supreme Court, Fulton v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) is investigating whether a secretly recorded conversation between three City Council members and a labor leader that included racist insults and slurs was made illegally. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony Highlights Legal Risks for Trump Yahoo News – Alan Feuer and Glenn Thrush (New York Times) | Published: 6/29/2022 The extent to which the Justice Department’s expanding criminal inquiry into the insurrection at the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Senate by an all-Democrat 50-50 party line vote, with Vice President Harris breaking the tie and ensuring passage. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
In Harris, the Justices questioned the foundation for the precedent, established in Abood v. [read post]
