Search for: "U.S. v. Cola" Results 41 - 60 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2021, 1:54 pm
Coca-Cola Enters., Inc., 300 F.3d 620, 627 (5th Cir. 2002)); Surgical Care Ctr. of Hammond, L.C. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[ii] Smart contracts have already been used in connection with real estate transactions,[iii] bank bonds,[iv] interbank transfers,[v] invoice financing,[vi] and homeowners, renters, pet, and flight-delay insurance. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 9:39 am by John Jascob
As a result, Comerford said the purchaser should record a liability (rather than a trade account payable) on its balance sheet under Article V of Regulation S-X. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. 102 (2014) (noting that the FDA does not have the expertise to evaluate nor authority to enforce false advertising claims).) [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Barry Sookman
In some cases, where governments have introduced regulation in fast moving technological areas too quickly or without adequately understanding the potential impacts, the laws have had unintended consequences; the Canadian anti-spam law (CASL),[4] and the U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 1:30 am
Thus it was that as a result of Gideon v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
The recent hearing at the Intellectual Property subcommittee to the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
She cites proposed marks such as “Marijuana Cola” and “You Can’t Spell Healthcare Without THC,” which were rejected by the U.S. [read post]