Search for: "U.S. v. Concepcion" Results 41 - 60 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2020, 7:01 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), explained that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) “was enacted in 1925 in response to widespread judicial hostility to arbitration agreements. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:51 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
Rent-A-Center appeals that could produce the next blockbuster U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:48 pm by Greg Mersol
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), the Supreme Court again visited FAA preemption of arbitration laws in California and similarly invalidated California law relating to limits on arbitration agreements. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:43 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339 (2011) (FAA preempted California state law prohibiting class action waivers in consumer arbitration provisions). [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:09 am by John Lewis
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 348-49 (2011), the panel acknowledged that class actions can bind unnamed parties who must be accorded due process, including notice, ability to be heard and to opt out of the class. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:37 pm by Brian Murphy and Myles Moran*
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 341 (2011) (“When state law prohibits outright the arbitration of a particular type of claim, the analysis is straightforward: The conflicting rule is displaced by the FAA. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by John Lewis
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), the district court decided a party “seeking to avoid arbitration generally bears the burden of showing the agreement to be inapplicable or invalid,” citing Harrington v. [read post]