Search for: "U.S. v. Dugan*"
Results 41 - 43
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Beyer was the invited speaker for a telephone seminar as part of the U.S. [read post]
