Search for: "U.S. v. Foley" Results 41 - 60 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Oklahoma, following a cigarette tax increase from $1.03 to $2.03 in the Summer of 2018, has seen a significant increase in smuggling into the state, moving it from a ranking of 30th to 17th highest inflow of cigarettes in the U.S. [read post]
The Commission on Theft of American Intellectual Property reported in 2017 that the annual “estimated low-end cost of [international] trade secret theft to U.S. firms was $180 billion, or 1% of U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
After supporters of then-President Trump stormed the U.S. [read post]
Appeals filed by individuals residing in certain U.S. territories will be carried out by the applicable entity within the state in the same manner as appeals regarding regular unemployment compensation. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Trump supporting the killer of two people in Kenosha, and refusing to allow Confederate generals’ names to be removed from U.S. military bases? [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (2015) 2015: Damon Root, Over Ruled: The Long War for the Control of the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah of CMS preview the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court on 12-13 May 2020 in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]