Search for: "U.S. v. Hays*"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 9:29 pm
See Quanta, 553 U.S. at 631. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:03 am
In Hayslip v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
We would need to consider whether to distinguish between targets who are known or reasonably believed to be U.S. persons, those who are known or reasonably believed not to be U.S. persons, and those whose status is uncertain.[8] In today’s world, nationality is often difficult to discern; even in 1978, FISA required assumptions about nationality that were largely based on location.[9] As location becomes more indeterminate, nationality may as well. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 7:01 am
U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 pm
(Brady v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:38 pm
U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:12 am
You might want to compare that to the What We do Page on the SEC’s website: The mission of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:38 pm
U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
The reason is that the case, Zietz v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
This requirement stems, in part, from Diamond v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
The McNulty Memorandum, released in 2006, stated that prosecutors could only request privilege waivers if there was a “legitimate need” for the privileged information, and that if a legitimate need existed after going through a multi-factor analysis, prosecutors should seek the least intrusive waiver necessary to complete a thorough investigation.[4] The Filip Memorandum, not a memorandum per se, made revisions in 2008 to the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am
So what I wrote a couple of days ago about how even the #1 Apple fanboy among U.S. judges (not Judge Koh; she's just the worst pro-weak-patent activist out there, definitely worse than her frequently-criticized colleagues in the Eastern District of Texas) has lost his faith in some of Apple's patents-in-suit against Samsung is not really relevant to what I think of Apple's overall outlook.My disagreement with Apple on its choice of a license for Swift also wasn't a key… [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
"You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:48 am
Court of Appeals in Thaler v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Douglas Berman considers Monday’s decision in Dean v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:43 am
[iv] The judge has the support of both of North Dakota’s U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
The next question asked about the landmark case of Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm
[v] What makes the Solarwinds attack difficult is that (1) for the most part entities allowed the updates as [read post]
