Search for: "U.S. v. Hubbard*"
Results 41 - 60
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 5:08 pm
Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am
The U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 30 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
****************************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 27 [week ending Sunday 4 January] -- The Irish PTO on well-known TMs’ extended protection in Stone Electrical Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc | The Irish PTO on revocation for non-use in HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company | Criminal penalty for infringement in Sweden | Congratulations to Trevor… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
I thought about Daisy when Katfriend Chris Torrero brought to our attention a decision issued by the 9th U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm
;Discussants: Lieutenant General Flora Darpino, U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
TURNER v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (1990). [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:36 am
Johnson, 2014 U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
Hoehling v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:19 am
Everyone agrees that Erie Railroad v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:30 am
MINTON v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:45 am
In Washington v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 89 S.Ct. 1243, 22 L.Ed.2d 542 (1969) and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am
United Artists Television, 392 U.S. 390, (1968);Teleprompter v. [read post]
