Search for: "U.S. v. Janssen" Results 41 - 60 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am by Brian A. Comer
Jurors also found that J&J warning label information on Risperdal was deceptive.The state’s case centered on drug-safety claims that New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J and Janssen made in November 2003 correspondence to about 700,000 doctors across the U.S., including 7,200 in South Carolina.The U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V., No. 21-202 (NHK-Fintiv rule for denying petitions; appealability of IPR petition denial); Apple Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
In In re ‘318 Patent Infringement Litigation (Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
Janssen Pharmaceutica Products LLP and Alza Corporation, CA No. 05-8116, U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:12 am by Brian A. Comer
Sales of the drug fell to $527 million last year, according to a January earnings report.Risperdal Consta, the long-acting version of the antipsychotic drug, generated $1.5 billion in sales last year for J&J.The state’s case centered on drug-safety claims that J&J and Janssen made in November 2003 correspondence to about 700,000 doctors across the U.S., including more than 7,000 in South Carolina.The U.S. [read post]