Search for: "U.S. v. Latham*" Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Salceda, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Tellabs v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am
Lobrano, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, January 28, 2017 Tags: Bankruptcy, Bondholders, Debt, Debtor-creditor law, Distressed companies, Foreclosures, Restructurings, Securities regulation, Trust Indenture Act, U.S. federal courts The Spotlight on Boards 2017 Posted by Martin Lipton and Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting,… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:55 pm by Kathryn Rubino
[Law School Toolbox] * A "frustrating" and "heartbreaking" decision: U.S. v. [read post]