Search for: "U.S. v. Mckenzie" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2014, 10:24 am
The increase in penalty means the maximum is higher in Canada than it is in the U.S. or U.K.In the trial decision in R. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
This Kat, being a hoary type, recalls the tumult that accompanied the 1986 decision by the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
This post was written by guest Kat Nadia, and posted by Jeremy"Passing Off and Unfair Competition", hosted by Baker & McKenzie LLP, was the subject of the third event held by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (JIPLP) in conjunction with its German partners at GRUR Int.Passing offThe first talk came from Ben Allgrove, a partner at Baker & McKenzie and a contributor to JIPLP. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court also dismissed his claim that Ramadan meals were served as late as possible in retaliation for his arguing about the proper time to serve these meals.In McKenzie v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
  Prior to joining the faculty at Missouri, Dr Strong was Counsel specializing in international dispute resolution at Baker & McKenzie LLP and a dual-qualified practitioner (U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:15 pm by Eugene K. Connors
McKenzie-Fiumara recently wrote a client alert regarding the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:03 pm by Deepak Gupta
The attorney for the lender, McKenzie Check Advance, contended that Bland's argument was foreclosed by AT&T v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
Prior to joining the faculty at Missouri, Dr Strong was Counsel specializing in international dispute resolution at Baker & McKenzie LLP and a dual-qualified practitioner (U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:42 am by Victoria VanBuren
  Prior to joining the faculty at Missouri, Dr Strong was Counsel specializing in international dispute resolution at Baker & McKenzie LLP and a dual-qualified practitioner (U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
While the importance of this distinction under U.S. law diminished after the Supreme Court decision in the "Pretty Woman" case (Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.) in 1994 here, it still seems to occupy a more central role in the jurisprudence in other jurisdictions. [read post]