Search for: "U.S. v. Shah" Results 41 - 60 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am by fjhinojosa
Rosen’s article The Judge Advocate General’s School, U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Bijal Shah
More recently, in U.S. v Arthrex, both the U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
  Expanding Presidential Influence on Agency Adjudication July 23, 2021 | Bijal Shah, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda:     THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto     Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020)    July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Thalia Kruger
Citibank, 201 F.3d 134, 138 (2d Cir. 2000), and an Iranian judgment against the sister of the former Shah, Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
For instance, if the U.S. were to apply a 21 percent minimum tax rate, and a company had a foreign effective tax rate of 5 percent, the U.S. would be able to tax the difference between the 5 percent and 21 percent rates to collect the “tax deficit. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
Thuraissigiam (2020) (see Aditi Shah’s analysis here). [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 8:25 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Amanda Tyler compared this ruling to Boumediene v. [read post]